Before And After The Marriage Act Of 1753 History Essay

Class surely played a portion in matrimony in the sixteenth century, as romantic love was non seen as a good ground for matrimony. The higher up the category graduated table a individual was the more likely they were to hold an arranged matrimony. Marriage was considered instead of import as it enhanced your standing in society, particularly for the male as he would go a individual of effect and would derive the function of maestro of the house. “ Conscious of the duties a hubby assumed on matrimony, parents of girls favoured a adult male of agencies and adulthood. ”[ 1 ]

Arranged matrimonies were frowned upon by the church but however many arranged matrimonies took topographic point with the honeymooners frequently being in their early teens and get marrieding through force per unit area with “ some adult females felt forced into matrimony by their fortunes, unwilling to stay a load on their household. ”[ 2 ]

However the lower category tended to get married person they had spent a great trade of clip with as they tended to socialize in groups, the lower category frequently married at an older age due to the demand to salvage up and get some land to put up place.

Marriage in 16th Century Britain was really different to the matrimonies of today ‘s universe, as Stone pointed out “ matrimony among the propertied categories in sixteenth-century England was a corporate determination of household and family, non an single 1. ”[ 3 ]

This shows that category was an of import portion of matrimony with rich households frequently set uping matrimonies for their kids from a really immature age as It was more common for the wealthier households to set up matrimonies as it was a serious and complicated affair but, as Stephanie Coontz put it, “ If love could turn out of it, that was fantastic. ”[ 4 ]

Poorer people could get married subsequently and had more pick. Civil and ecclesiastical jurisprudence enabled matrimony at an early age – 12 for a miss and 14 for a male child.

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

The legal demands for a matrimony before the Marriage act of 1753 was a simple procedure of assuring to make so in the presence of a informant furthered by the physical consummating of the relationship.

Such informal matrimonies were non approved by the church who wanted all twosomes to get married in church before a curate, after the public proclamation of the purpose to get married had been carried out for three hebdomads, this is besides known as the reading of the banns but “ fall backing to irregular matrimony was apparent in the 16th century. ”[ 5 ]

This signifier of battle was much stricter than those of today as such a promise was seen, as tantamount to a matrimony and it would non be a rare happening for the brides to be transporting kid.

Most seventeenth century matrimonies were arranged nuptialss with consent being an of import issue as love was non seen as a strong platform for matrimony but was viewed as a foundation as this would intend the twosome were both compatible and comfy with one another.

The bride ‘s household would frequently pay a amount of money known as a dowery to the groom to pay for the care of the adult females who in return was promised her ‘dower ‘ which was a per centum of the brides estate that the married woman would be entitled to on his decease.

However, love did get down to be used for matrimony with the enlightenment train of idea and the belief that the chase of felicity was the significance of life. Marriage through love was now get downing to be considered more of import than material goods. The Industrial Revolution would farther consolidate this position as the in-between category increased tenfold and immature unmarried mans could afford to pay for their ain nuptials, parental blessing and agreement for matrimony were no longer as of import or needed.

The Marriage Act 1753 or An Act for the Better Preventing of Clandestine Marriage to give it its full rubric gained Royal Assent in 1754 and came into force on March 25th of that twelvemonth. It was the first statutory statute law to necessitate a ceremonial of matrimony in England and Wales and revolutionized the manner marriages performed.

Consent to get married for anybody under the age of 21 became jurisprudence ; nevertheless a bound on age was non introduced. The nuptials would besides hold to take topographic point and be celebrated in church with an entry, signed by all parties, being placed in the parish records. It can be argued that the jurisprudence was a response to the upper categories agitation at mode in which immature inheritor were trapped in an insoluble matrimony and would lose their money.

Furthermore, the Act made it a legal demand for the reading of the banns to be carried out for three consecutive hebdomads prior to the nuptials taking topographic point if the parties wishing to get married did non hold a licence to make so. Marriages of under 21 ‘s were acceptable on license if they had gained the parental consent they needed. However, marriages done so by the reading of the banns were valid unless the parent of the youngest had forbidden the banns. The Act was extremely successful in its declared purpose of seting a halt to clandestine matrimonies

By the eighteenth Century, twosomes were progressively given the freedom to take their ain spouse and many relationships began being based on personal penchant and attractive force instead than by the parent ‘s orders.

Top of Form

By the nineteenth Century British adult females carried the outlook o going pregnant, nevertheless due to life anticipation being greater for misss than that of the male childs, coupled with the figure of males functioning in the armed force resulted in a deficit of suited partners.

English jurisprudence became based on the rule that the male would gain the money whilst the females stayed at place and ‘kept ‘ the house. The few adult females that did work proverb her rewards passed straight to their hubbies under the 1882 Married Property Act.

Women ‘s rights had non truly been affected by the Marriage Act with females from upper category households being the lone 1s who had entree to instruction, albeit in topics viewed as necessary accomplishments for adult females, such as embellishment

This deficiency of instruction was seen as unbeneficial by adult females as it did non develop the adult females in any manner other than humble undertakings.

In her book, A exoneration of the rights of adult females, Mary Wollstonecraft, claimed that through instruction would come emancipation and that adult females had a right to be educated due to it being she who is chiefly responsible for the instruction of the immature.

Furthermore, Mary Wollstonecraft stated that educating the adult females the same, as work forces would beef up matrimony, as the twosome would hold some subject to portion and speak about and that a stable matrimony is a partnership between a hubby and a married woman – a matrimony is a societal contract between two persons.[ 6 ]

Wollstonecraft goes on to reason that educating adult females will beef up the matrimony relationship. Her construct of matrimony underlies this statement. A adult female therefore needs to hold equal cognition and sense, to keep the partnership. A stable matrimony besides provides for the proper instruction of kids.[ 7 ]

It was impossible for a adult female to be granted a divorce even if the male had committed adultery, as the ideal was that upper and in-between category adult females were dependent on a male figure, male parent, and hubby. Work force were given the right to disassociate if their adult female had been extramarital under the Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857, adult females, nevertheless could non disassociate their hubby if he committed criminal conversation.

If a divorce was granted the ‘ownership ‘ of the kids was passed to the male parent who had the power to ostracize the female parent from the kids if he so desired.

Divorce became a less and less forbidden topic due to the spiritual reformation and the manner in which society began to oppugn the cogency of the church and God.

Notwithstanding the ardor of spiritual reformists in Europe, the established church was brought into inquiry during the reign of Henry VIII and in bend, Protestantism prevailed with the new church taking case in point.

The function of the household became an of import issue for theoreticians, none more so than Lawrence Stone, who, in 1977, put frontward his theory the three phases of motion within the household. Rock claims that a power displacement in the attitudes towards matrimony could be seen through the early modern period, with ‘affective individuality ‘ replacing the cold patriarchal traits.

Rocks three motions can be summarised as:

The unfastened line of descent household 1450 – 1630. The attitude towards relations would hold been formal to a point of about been misanthropic and indurate. Upper category twosomes were distant to each other and as a consequence, their ( often-arranged ) matrimony was kindred to a concern relationship. The immediate household were held in the same respect as the line of descent members.

Restricted patriarchal atomic household 1550 – 1700. The importance of affinity was replaced with a turning importance been placed on the immediate relations. This coincided with The Reformation knocking arranged matrimonies and the coldness within them, along with emphasizing the importance of a close knit household.

Closed domesticated atomic household 1640 – 1800. Love becomes precedence with patriarchate in fast diminution. Children were shown great fondness and seen as a gift instead than a load. Marriage for love became the norm and replaced the economic grounds to get married. The rise of the romantic novel allowed sex and passion to be legitimate in matrimony and non merely a tool for reproduction. Romantic love was the ground for matrimony, non concern.

Rock did face unfavorable judgment though, possibly, none more so than at the custodies of Alan Macfarlane who claimed that Stones thesis was flawed as it had overlapping periods, which gave no consideration to the fact it created conflicting grounds.

Rock was besides criticised for utilizing grounds associated with the Roman Catholics and utilizing them to beef up his statement about the Reformation, for illustration claiming sex was a mere tool for reproduction.

Rocks statement that people were discouraged from matrimony and emotional fond regard due to the high mortality rate is flawed, given that the mortality rates had sustained a high rate in the early 18th century, a clip that Stone claims fondness and love was turning and taking over as the chief ground for matrimony

Finally, manuscripts and other medieval beginnings ( Chaucer ) did non endorse up, nor consolidate his statement that matrimony was a loveless brotherhood with a deficiency of fondness for the partners. With romantic novels dining it was clear that people had an understanding and grasp of love.