Discussing The Process Of Risk Management Information Technology Essay

This is a instance survey on the procedure of hazard direction involved in the ascent of a web monitoring application ( Netcool suite ) for a telecommunication company. This instance -study describes the procedure of hazard direction. Which involves placing the hazards involved, analysing the possible impacts of the hazards on the undertaking, and how the hazards can be monitored. ( Garvey 2001 ) .

1.1 Overview of procedure of Risk Management.

Risk Management is a method of placing, analysing, cut downing and supervising the hazards involved in procedure or activity. Events or state of affairs that could hold negative impact or reverse on a undertaking. The procedure of hazard direction is described as follows.

1. Identify: This is procedure of placing hazards involved in transporting out a undertaking or activity.

2. Buttocks: This procedure involves analysing the hazards identified and the impact on the undertaking through an agreed standards by the undertaking members. ( MOD 2001 )

3. Plan: This procedure involves programs on how the hazards discovered with be handled.

4. Implement: This procedure involves implementing, proctor, study and reexamine Risk Management actions against aims.

1.2 Case: Telecommunication Company Software Upgrade.

For the ascent of the web monitoring application, the undermentioned procedure of hazard direction was carried out. This procedure is done iteratively.

1.2.1 Identify Risk.

The first measure will be to place the hazards that could happen in the procedure of upgrading the application. That is events that could hold negative impact on the undertaking. This can be done with usage of package ( application ) or using the service of an expert in hazard direction or the netcool adviser assigned to the undertaking base on experience. At the terminal of the procedure a written- hazards statement will be generated. The hazard statement service as a papers to be represented to the direction of the company, so that the people involve with the undertaking will cognize all the hazards or unanticipated events that could happen and the impact on the undertaking. ( Garvey 2001 ) .So that the hazards involved will be analyzed by all the people involved with the undertaking. After transporting out the designation procedure. The undermentioned hazards were discovered.

Hazard Analysis worksheet

Hazard nos

Hazard factor

Description

001

The continuance of the undertaking and the impact of the undertaking on the concern

The timeframe for the undertaking and the impact of the ascent on the concern

002

How to acquire proficient support for the undertaking after completion

How Supports for the undertaking because netcool accomplishments are scare and training staff will take months.

Table 1 screening. Hazard Analysis Worksheet

1.2.2 Analyze Hazard

At this degree, the hazards discovered will be analyzed base on an in agreement standard. A hazard evaluation matrix is used to analyse the hazard identified. This is generated through the chance that a hazard will and the impact on the undertaking. The hazard evaluation matrix is standardized for this undertaking and acknowledged by the members of undertaking squad. ( Garvey 2001 )

Table 2 shows the chance that a hazard can happen.

Probability

Description

About CERTAIN

1 in 10 opportunity

Likely TO OCCUR

Likely

1 in 100 opportunity

WILL PROBABLY OCCUR

Possible

1 in 1000 opportunity

MAY OCCUR OCCASIONALLY

UNLIKELY

1 in 10,000 opportunity

DO NOT EXPECT TO HAPPEN

Rare

1 in 100,000 opportunity

DO NOT BELIEVE WILL EVER HAPPEN

Beginning: ( Garvey 2001 )

The impact of the hazard on the undertaking is determined by consequence on cost of the undertaking, continuance and proficient impact.

Table 3 shows the impact of hazard on the undertaking

Hazard nos

Probability Rating

Cost Impact Rating

Schedule Impact Rating

Technical Impact Rating

Timeframe Rating

.001

High/ 0.75

High/ 0.83

High/ 0.65

Moderate/ 0.40

Short/ 0.83

002

Medium/ 0.45

Severe/ 1.00

High/ 0.65

Moderate/ 0.40

Medium/ 0.60

003

Medium/ 0.60

Moderate/ 0.50

Moderate/ 0.60

High/ 0.83

Long/ 0.18

Beginning: ( Garvey 2001 ) .

Table 4: Hazard evaluation matrix

Probability

Impact

none

Minor

Moderate

High

Severe

About Certain

Low

none

High

High

High

Likely

Low

none

none

High

High

Possible

Low

Low

none

High

High

Unlikely

Very Low

Low

none

none

none

Rare

Very Low

Very Low

Low

Low

none

Beginning: ( AS/NZS 4360: 1999 )

1.2.3 Plan

This procedure of the hazard direction is used to develop a expression to bring forth the comparative rank-order of the identified hazards. In this hazard evaluation matrix is used, from table we can acquire the consequence.

Table 5 show the rank -order of the analyzed hazard

Hazard nos

Impact Rating

Hazard Precedence

Rating

Hazard Precedence

Ranking

001

Moderate

High

2nd

002

Severe

Severe

1st

Beginning: ( Garvey 2001 )

1.2.4 Implement or manage.

This is the degree where the company will take action whether to cut down or avoid it the hazard identified.

1.3 Decision

With the hazard direction procedure carried out on the undertaking, the direction of the company will be able to place the hazard involved in the ascent of the NMS ( netcool ) and the impact on the undertaking.Also technique on how to avoid or cut down or incorporate the hazard is developed.

2 ) What are the processs for implements TQM and the barriers? Explain your reply

2.0 Introduction

This write-up is about the process of implementing entire quality direction and it barriers or restriction.

2.2 Overview

Entire quality direction is a direction process employ by the direction to pull off the company resource in order to better client satisfactions and on the long tally better the company underside line and cut downing uneconomical losingss. The clients could internal or external.

2.1 Principles of Entire Quality Management

When implementing TQM, there are basic rules to be considered, which have been proven to be effectual in concern direction. The following are the rules of TQM

Customer

Attention should be focused on clients, whether internal or external. Because it is their attempt that reflects the quality of the organisation and on long tally alteration the bottom line of the organisation.

2. Authorization

Everybody needs to be involved with the procedure of implementing TQM. This can be achieved by authorising the staff through preparation and supplying right environment.

3. Communication

The staff needs to be informed about the company or organisation values and vision.

4. Management committedness.

The direction of the company should be involved in the procedure, that is carry out reappraisal and supervise the procedure

2.3 Procedures of implementing TQM

There is no standard manner or process of implementing TQM. There are different theoretical accounts used in implementing TQM. Examples are Deming Application Prize, the Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence, the ISO Series of Standards, etc

TQM execution should be structured in a mode that is best for the organisation, but the undermentioned basic stairss.

1. Focus on the demand of client:

The theoretical account should concentrate on the demands of the client. By reexamining the behaviour or demands of the client. With this the organisation will be able to be after and foretell

Customer ‘s future behaviour. ( Silicon Fareast 2004 )

2. Plan around the client

The activities of the company are planned around the client. The program of the company is reviewed sporadically to see that it ‘s in line with the client demands. ( Silicon Fareast 2004 )

3. Entire engagement:

By involve the client in all the activities of the company.

4. The company should better the procedures required to present the merchandises and services needed by the client.

Finally the procedure may be applied iteratively for uninterrupted betterment

2.4 Barriers of implementing TQM

Poor Planning: when there is no good scheme program in topographic point

Lack of direction committedness

Resistance of the work force

Teamwork complacence –

.