What Is The Glorious Revolution History Essay

Throughout the centuries and decennaries taking up to the Glorious Revolution, there was an progressively noticeable struggle between both the Protestants and Roman Catholics within Britain. In England, it was mostly believed for rather some clip that the Catholic Church was corrupted beyond fix. Those in power besides felt that apostolic authorization, as the Pope had the power to unchurch, was sabotaging the power of the sovereign and as a consequence doing England inferior to other states such as France and Spain. Due to this many British citizens had a great antipathy for Catholicism and affairs took a bend for the worse with the coronation of King James II. Shortly after James II took the Crown he had promised to demo favouritism to neither the Protestants nor the Catholics. Over the old ages nevertheless the King enforced policies that openly encouraged people to change over to Catholicism, and he began taking Protestants from power merely to replace them with Catholics. There was so a popular rebellion in which William of Orange invaded and, with the support of most of the British people, took the throne. The Glorious Revolution, which is one of the few discolorations on British history, was a authoritative narrative of an opprobrious sovereign, a spiritual struggle, and a elusive vying for power which has seldom been seen since.

The Glorious Revolution genuinely was a turning point in British history. One the one manus, there was a long history of absolutist monarchy within Britain, but on the other manus Britain has been known of all time since to be a limited, constitutional monarchy. The line that divides the two different signifiers of authorities is the revolution itself. Britain could merely be what it is today if the events during this revolution occurred. Yet before this revolution Britain was a state that few today would be able to acknowledge. England through the old ages of 1685-1688 was non yet industrialized, and the economic system basically rested upon its agrarianism and pastoralism. It was a state of merely five and a half million people, but they were people who wanted a sensible authorities and were unwilling to let themselves to be oppressed in any manner.[ 1 ]It was because of this that the signifier that the Revolution took was so immensely different than what we typically associate with the ruin of a authorities by putsch d’etat. This revolution was wholly unlike what we think of when we analyze the American Revolution, the Gallic Revolution, or the October Revolution all of which came after and were far bloodier. The historian and scholar George Macauley Trevelyn wrote in his book The English Revolution: 1688-1689 that, “ The ejection of [ King ] James was a radical act, but otherwise the spirit of the revolution was the antonym of radical. It came to subvert the jurisprudence, but to corroborate it against a law-breaking male monarch. It came non to hale people into one form of sentiment in political relations or faith but to give them freedom under jurisprudence. ”[ 2 ]David Ogg besides noted in his life of William III how different this revolution was by stating that, “ there was non a word about democracy, about the economic improvement of the people, or about the extension of the franchise, but at that place was a great trade about the simple legal rights of the topic, rights to which we are now so accustomed that we take them for granted and, hence, assume that they have ne’er been threatened. ” The unfortunate truth of the affair is nevertheless, that those freedoms have been threatened and some of those freedoms that we take for granted today were threatened by King James II in 1687.

The period of clip taking up to the deposition of King James II was marked by the political doctrine of tyranny. It is the inclination of the sovereign to presume any and all powers necessary, whether existent or perceived. The male monarchs will, in an absolutist system, is the merely will – it is the will of the province. Absolutism makes the province a mere setup to accomplish the male monarchs ain personal wants and this is best described by the Gallic King Louis XIV ‘s statements, “ l’etat c’est moi ” ( I am the province ) .[ 3 ]Over clip nevertheless, the sovereign of Europe, and in this instance of Britain, began mistreating their powers and as a consequence tyranny came to an terminal.

The revolution itself began in 1688 when King James II was replaced by his Protestant girl Mary and her Dutch hubby William II of Orange. At this point the underpinnings of absolutist authorities, the Godhead right theory, no longer held.[ 4 ]The male monarch no longer wielded his power merely because of the blood coursing through his venas but instead the will of the people as embodied by the Parliament. This revolution occurred because volatile mix of personal reputes, self-importance, spiritual struggle, and maltreatment of power, but it was made possible by the two parties of England whom facilitated it in Parliament. One of the parties, the Whigs, did non believe that the male monarch should hold such limitless authorization, and the other, the Tories, believed that the male monarch was appointed by God through the procedure of coevals and as a consequence could non be usurped.[ 5 ]Most of the English at this clip were at least Tories in the thought that the male monarch ought non to be undermined, but this averment was about to be tested. King James II had put into topographic point many mechanisms which efficaciously forced the Tories to take between their church and their male monarch, and by forcing them to far in this he led to his ain death.

These sentiments were non born over dark, nevertheless, this sort of displacement off from monarchal power was in the plants, so to talk, for rather some clip. In world, the revolution was the flood tide of a historical tendency of about five decennaries of power battle. This tendency began in the 1640 ‘s as the English engaged in a civil war that was fought over spiritual tolerance and the place of parliament. In clip resistance grew amongst a really Puritan middle-class, and King Charles I was dethroned and beheaded. A period of military absolutism led by Oliver Cromwell so came to power. Cromwell and his crony authorities was radically Puritan and, due to this utmost nature, were non favored by history to be the future leaders of Britain. Cromwell died in 1658 and his government came to a fleet terminal. What came following was a peaceable period of a democracy, but it was ephemeral and afterwards the monarchy was restored under Charles II. King Charles II ascended to the English throne in 1660, and he came to govern a state filled with assorted spiritual feelings. Citizens during this clip that were outside of the Church of England became known dissidents, and during the Restoration they were non taxed below the belt as they had been earlier. Yet limitations were put into topographic point which prevented them from freely exerting their faith and which suppressed their political influence. The Test Acts of the Apostless and others of the sort prohibited all dissidents from taking office unless they met certain demands. These demands included but were non limited to taking an curse denouncing the transubstantiation philosophy, and taking sacrament merely in the Anglican Church. The consequence was a great tenseness between the Stuart male monarchs and the dissidents.[ 6 ]

When King Charles II died on February 16th 1685, there was a great difference over the line of sequence given that the following legitimate inheritor to the throne was his brother James who was a Roman Catholic. This is when the political parties began developing and English political relations began diverging. Those who believed that the Parliament should be able to restrict the male monarch began utilizing this spiritual tenseness to their advantage and tried, unsuccessfully, to alter the line of sequence. The Tories backed familial sequence, and the Whigs supported an active parliamentary stance in protecting Protestantism from the Roman Catholic male monarch. In the terminal, the Tories were winning, and some Whig leaders were so afraid because of their resistance to King James II that they fled the state.[ 7 ]

Coronated on May 3rd 1685, King James II took the throne and instantly came across as a male monarch that everyone could digest regardless of his spiritual association. His first announcement to the English people said that he would stay by the bing Torahs and would non utilize arbitrary power over them – this turned out to be a instead bold prevarication. He had still maintained the leftovers power that his brother held, who although non absolutist in the strictest sense, was still able to act upon elections. King James ‘ first parliament convened on May 29th of 1685, and unsurprisingly had the most pro-royalty members since 1661.[ 8 ]King James was really so proud of this fact that he boasted that fewer than 40 of the five-hundred 13 members of the House of Commons did non O.K. of his policies.[ 9 ]Then when his brother ‘s illicit boy, the Duke of Monmouth, led an armed rebellion against the monarchy landing in Lyme Regis on June 21st 1685, the parliament bolstered itself even further in favour of the male monarch.[ 10 ]The memories of the monarchy and old maltreatments of power were still to recent in memory to let the Duke to prehend power. Concerns had developed that if this were to go on it was rather possible for the Parliament to be wholly dissolved and this was something that no 1 wanted. Although maltreatments of power came in due clip, and by the King who had explicitly promised his people that this would non be the instance however.

At this clip, there were no existent menaces to King James II ‘s power. The male monarch ‘s first matrimony had produced two girls both of which were Protestant, and his 2nd matrimony to Queen Mary had non produced any kids. Thus the Protestants rested good and assured themselves that a Protestant male monarch was about a certainty in the hereafter. Even the clergy of the Church of England supported the male monarch, and openly preached that he should be supported so long as he kept the promise of his first announcement.[ 11 ]

The first mark that the male monarch might non maintain his promise was exemplified in his retaining the Earl of Sunderland as Secretary of State merely after he assured the male monarch that he sympathized with the Roman Catholics.[ 12 ]The King so began merely illicitly utilizing his distributing power to name Roman Catholics to office even though they barred by jurisprudence. What this did was efficaciously suspend the Test Acts which still held the full force of jurisprudence. He appointed Catholics to places in the ground forces, in the tribunals, in the House of Lords, and many local offices. Finally, people had had plenty and a adult male by the name of Sir Edward Hale was brought to test on the footing that he held office illicitly. The tribunal ruled, in a ballot of eleven to one, that, “ We [ justnesss ] think we may really good declare the sentiment of the tribunal to be that the King may distribute in this instance. ”[ 13 ]This happened merely a few months after the male monarch had replaced six of the 12 justnesss with his ain protagonists.[ 14 ]

As if things could non look to acquire any worse for the Tories, and better for the Whigs, the King issued his Second Declaration of Indulgence merely as rumours were go arounding about his married woman ‘s gestation. This declaration granted tolerance to the Roman Catholics and Dissenters, and in it he said, “ We can non but heartily wish, as it will easy be believed, that all the peoples of our rules were members of the Catholic Church. Yet we meekly thank Almighty God it is, and hath of long clip been our changeless sense and opinionaˆ¦that scruples ought non to be constrained, no people forced in affairs of mere faith. ”[ 15 ]He ordered that it be read in every Anglican Church within the hebdomad, but seven bishops refused, including the Archbishop of Canterbury William Sancroft, and they petitioned him on the affair. The bishops were arrested, imprisoned, and brought to test – all to be subsequently acquitted as even the tribunals had had plenty. One of the lone surviving journals that straight commented on this test was written by a adult male named John Evelyn and he wrote, “ The test lasted nine in the forenoon to past six in the eveningaˆ¦they were acquittedaˆ¦there was great rejoicing. aˆ¦Bonfires were made that dark, and bells round, which was taken really badly at the tribunal. ” Sir John Reresby besides corroborates this narrative stating that, “ Bonfires were made, non merely in the metropolis of London, but in most of the towns of Englandaˆ¦the following twenty-four hours I waited on the kingaˆ¦where everyone observed him to labour under a really great perturbation of the head. ”[ 16 ]It is even claimed that the male monarch said, “ So much the worse for them ” after he learned of their acquittal.[ 17 ]If anything is certain it is that the male monarch was greatly displeased by non holding his will carried out without any statement or difference. To do affairs worse, his boy was born merely a month before the acquittal, and so spiritual tensenesss built up as many believed the Roman Catholic dynasty was at that place to remain.[ 18 ]

The maltreatments of power that King James II carried out were genuinely dissatisfactory given his first announcement as male monarch, but were non something that the English should hold been wholly nescient of given the absolutist inclinations of the male monarchs before him. Bishop Gilbert Burnett described the male monarch in his History of my Own Times, “ there was the greatest prince, and like to be the best general of his clip. aˆ¦Yet he rapidly ran into affairs and viceaˆ¦and in the terminal of his life he came to lose his repute of a brave adult male and good captain so wholly. aˆ¦He had no vivacity of thoughtaˆ¦but he had good opinion where his faith or his instruction gave him non a prejudice, which it did frequently. ”[ 19 ]Similarly, the male monarchs actions are articulately explained in Francis Turner ‘s 1948 life of King James II, “ [ James ] desired non merely that the power of the male monarch be existent, but that it should be obviously realaˆ¦ [ he ] valued power as a agency to the achievement of the passionately coveted object of his life: the transition of England to the Roman Church. aˆ¦his political and spiritual compulsions blinded him to the dangers he had to avoid. ”[ 20 ]Those dangers ended up spelling his death every bit good as the radical alterations came about because of them.

The relationship between France and England besides played a cardinal function in conveying about the overthrow of King James II, for his brother, Charles II, often turned to the Roman Catholic French King Louis XIV for aid. Many old ages before the reign of James, France had concluded an battle against Germany with the Truce of Ratisbon. This peace continued as the Germans were preoccupied with contending the Turks.[ 21 ]During this clip, William III of Orange began to see an chance originating to take the English throne which he had planned to make for some clip. William sent Everard von Weede the Lord of Dykveld to describe on the province of the English political clime and he brought back intelligence that James ‘ power was crumpling beneath him. William had besides had von Weede make it known to the politicians in England, who at that clip were softly be aftering a rebellion, that if adequate major politicians backed him he would occupy. On the same twenty-four hours that the seven bishops were acquitted, William received a missive signed by seven politicians, both Whig and Tory, ask foring him to occupy England and he made the determination to make merely that. By 1688, merely as James ‘ power was get downing to be undermined, and it appeared as though the Gallic wanted to work the Germans and suppress the Rhineland.[ 22 ]Germany realized this menace and became ferocious at the France. France and Germany engaged in war, and this kept the Gallic monarchy from giving support to James. The clip was eventually maturing for William ‘s invasion of the British Isles.

On November 5th, which is ironically the day of remembrance of the Gunpowder Treason against King James I, William III landed in Devonshire. Public sentiment of the male monarch had become so negative that William had bipartizan support in his invasion. This is exemplified by the rebellion in Yorkshire that occurred. Lord Danby, a Tory who strongly believed that the male monarch could non be limited, raised up an English ground forces that openly supported William. In fact, many ground forces officers who were non put into power by James chose to back up William. Sing his eminent remotion from the throne, King James tried to avoid the destiny of his male parent and he attempted to fly the state. James was caught in Kent and sent back to London where William allowed him to travel into expatriate in France.[ 23 ]James subsequently died in expatriate in the twelvemonth 1701 ne’er being able to reconstruct either his power or his name.[ 24 ]

Unsure of how to travel about covering with the self-imposed expatriate of their sovereign, the Parliament chose to denote his stepping down of the throne. What this did was let the Whigs to foster self-praise that they were able to take their sovereign and asseverate the Parliament ‘s authorization over the male monarch ‘s. It besides allowed the Tories to keep their statement that the male monarch ne’er had power taken off from him, but instead that he gave it up volitionally – a doubtful claim to state the least.[ 25 ]It was at this point that the Parliament truly began asseverating its ain power and genuinely conveying the epoch of tyranny to an terminal in Britain. The curse with which William III was sworn in by during his enthronement even stipulated that he had to detect the Torahs that Parliament passed. They so made it such that Torahs could no longer be “ suspended ” by the male monarch and passed a series of Mutiny Laws which gave them more rigorous control over the military to guarantee that another male monarch could non set his ain work forces into places of military power disregarded Torahs like the Test Acts.[ 26 ]This was non the terminal of their averment of power either, they passed a Bill of Rights in 1689 which brought the people closer to their side, they passed the Toleration Act of 1689 which gave spiritual freedom from dissidents to derive yet more support, they passed the Triennial Act of 1694 which guaranteed free elections every three old ages to forestall the male monarch from avoiding naming a session of parliament. In 1701 they besides passed the Act of Settlement which guaranteed that there was Protestant sequence to the throne.[ 27 ]

William III may come across as a adult male that wished to emancipate the English from an “ oppressive ” sovereign. This surely appeared true to Bishop Burnett who besides wrote, “ I asked [ William ‘s ] sense of the Church of England. He said he liked our worship good, and our authorities in the churchaˆ¦he said that [ acceptance ] was all he would of all time want to convey us to. ”[ 28 ]William III even carried out his promise of presenting spiritual freedom to the dissidents and stabilising the spiritual tensenesss that were present, but that is non to state he did non take the throne for selfish grounds. William III surely had a personal docket, and he brought it to fruition instead cleanly. William needed every bit much power as possible to stamp down his enemy, Louis XIV, and Britain afforded him exactly that. The pickings of Britain provoked France who so entered into a war with Britain that lasted about 25 old ages.[ 29 ]A alliance of Germans, Dutch, and British against France would certainly set the damper on French magnificence which was William ‘s end from the onset – and it did.

Sing how William III was utilizing his control of England to set the force per unit area on France, one must besides see that any menace to his power would besides overthrow his docket. For this ground, William III needed every bit much influence over British political relations as possible, a apparent contradiction for a adult male who claimed to be liberating the English from a autocrat. This provoked the Parliament into puting even tighter constitutional controls on the monarchy and which necessarily produced the constitutional monarchy that we see today.[ 30 ]No longer did the King have unlimited distributing power, no longer could he use his “ assumed power of suspending the Torahs ” without expressed blessing by the Parliament, and no thirster was Britain plagued by absolutist regulation.[ 31 ]

The Glorious Revolution is a revolution of great historical significance because it came approximately as consequence of a sovereign ‘s disregard of the implied societal contract and because it was carried out with no bloodshed, non in malice of these facts. The spiritual tensenesss and political necessities that had been turning in England since the civil war of 1660 had eventually been relieved and the Parliament eventually had the power it desired. In this sense, the Glorious Revolution may be seen as the climactic terminal of the English civil war. It besides has great historical significance because of the extremely secularized political doctrines that it spawned. Throughout the revolution, John Locke was composing his Two Treatises on Government, and the thoughts that the societal compact existed and that the crowned head was ceded power by the consent of the governed were spurred by the great political uproar of this period.[ 32 ]Without the Glorious Revolution it is non a hard stretch to state that Locke may ne’er hold written that work and that the Enlightenment Era may ne’er hold happened as a consequence. This short period of clip between 1685 and 1689 did hold a monolithic impact non merely British history but besides the history of the universe. Without James II ‘s compulsion over transition, William III ‘s demand to revenge against Louis XIV, Parliament ‘s hungriness for more power, and the English people ‘s demands for an terminal to the lunacy our universe would be immensely different. Those are the grounds why this authoritative narrative of an opprobrious sovereign, a spiritual struggle, and the vying for power are so incalculably of import.